Sections

Hoylman Longest on Specifics, Repeatedly a Target in Debate With Broad Agreement

Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:

Tom Greco, Brad Hoylman, and Tanika Inlaw at an August 20 State Senate Democratic primary debate. | GAY CITY NEWS

There were moments at the August 20 debate among the three candidates for the State Senate seat currently held by Thomas Duane when it looked like a debate might break out.

“I don’t fill shoes,” said Tom Greco, the straight owner of the Ritz Bar and Lounge, a popular Hell’s Kitchen gay bar. “I wear my own.”

Moments before, Brad Hoylman, the presumptive front runner in the race, told a crowd of roughly 100 that had gathered at the Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Community Center that “A lot of people tell me that Tom Duane is a hard act to follow.”

For the past 14 years, Duane, who is openly gay, has represented the district that runs from 72nd Street to the West Village and from river to river in its Lower Manhattan portion. He is a legendary liberal Democrat.

Hoylman, the one gay candidate in the race, never fails to salute Duane when he campaigns. The fact that Hoylman appears to have been selected as the incumbent’s heir was an issue.

“How are you supposed to get new ideas?” said Greco. “You need new ideas, fresh ideas, fresh people.”

The 90-minute debate, which was sponsored by Citizens Union, a non-partisan civic group, and NYC Community Media, the parent of Gay City News, the Villager, Chelsea Now, and Downtown Express, did showcase Hoylman’s better grasp on solutions to problems facing the district, New York City, and the state, but it also demonstrated the extent to which the candidates agree.

Tanika Inlaw, a public school teacher, identified her top three priorities if elected as defending and improving public education, building and protecting affordable housing, and campaign finance reform. Hoylman and Greco certainly support those goals. All three agreed that hydrofracking must be stopped, that public pensions must be sustained, and that the police practice of stop and frisk must end.

Ultimately, the winner of the September 13 Democratic primary (held on a Thursday in deference to the September 11 anniversary), which will decide who takes the seat, may be determined by more practical matters. Hoylman has far more money and far more political infrastructure behind him.

In his most recent filing with the state Board of Elections, Hoylman had an opening balance of roughly $171,000. He raised more than $80,000 since his previous filing just weeks before and had $209,416.45 in cash on hand. His money has come from the gay community, unions, Wall Street, and real estate interests.

Greco had an opening balance of $13,600. He raised $8,775 since the earlier report and had $16,875 in cash on hand.

Inlaw, who has filed one campaign finance report but not the most recently required follow-up, has loaned her campaign $1,403 and received a single donation of $150. She has debts, including her loan, of $2,748. As of July 17, she had $353 in cash on hand.

Like Greco, Inlaw took a poke at Hoylman’s backers.

“Unlike my opponent, I don’t have any special interests groups behind me,” she said. “I’m a public school teacher, I’m an ordinary American.”

Hoylman’s 12 years at the Partnership for New York City, a major business lobby, also came up. William C. Rudin, the chief executive officer of the real estate firm Rudin Management Company, is affiliated with the partnership and with New York University.

The Rudin company is taking over the St. Vincent’s Hospital and Medical Center property in the West Village to turn it into condominiums. The university just won city permission for a major expansion. Both plans are very controversial.

Hoylman said, “Absolutely” when Greco asked him if he had done everything he could to save the hospital “given your day job.” Hoylman added, “St. Vincent’s closed partly because of mismanagement. This was its second bankruptcy.”

Hoylman differentiated himself by pressing for specific solutions. Rather than cutting in the face of expected multi-billion state budget gaps, he wants new revenue sources. He noted that 20 percent of New York City residents are living in poverty.

“It’s this growing gap between the rich and the poor that really undermines our society,” he said. “We need a real millionaires’ tax. The governor cut our millionaires’ tax in half.”

When discussing funding for the Hudson River Park Trust, the agency that administers the West Side’s Hudson River Park, Hoylman suggested using money from lawsuit settlements won by the Lower Manhattan Development Corporation or from a state bank regulator that just collected $340 million.

“We need to identify more revenue sources,” Hoylman said.

Updated 5:17 pm, July 20, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook
Subscribe

Don’t miss our updates:


Reader feedback

John Scott says:
Another important issue for the community is education. As a past Vice-President of Community Education Council District 2, I can testify that Brad has been front and center on pushing for new schools in the district. He knows the parent leaders and they have endorsed him. It is a good sound bite to say you are for education, but I have never seen the other two candidates at a school meeting or Community Education Council District 2 meeting fighting for more schools. Yet another community issue that is important is Pier 40. As Chair of CB 2, Brad has a good grassroots understanding of the complexities of the issue. Two key players are Assemblymembers Richard Gottfried and Deborah Glick. Brad was endorsed by both and has good working relationships with them. Again, the two other candidates did not seem to know about the issue. John R Scott Democratic District Leader 66AD part B
Aug. 23, 2012, 12:28 pm
John Scott says:
I do not think that the Gay City News did justice to Brad’s debate win. Brad demonstrated a clear understanding of both local community and state issues. He was the first one to bring up the budget. He stated his support of raising the Millionaires tax and his support of the Living Wage and Sick Pay bills. I was one of the leaders that fought for the Living Wage bill and when I went to Brad for support, he gave 100%. He helped to get CB 2 and the VID to also pass resolutions in support. As a District Leader he voted for the resolution, which was unanimously passed by the Manhattan Democratic County. Brad's two opponents were nowhere to be found on this issue. John Scoot District Leader
Aug. 23, 2012, 1:27 pm
William Stribling says:
Regardless of how well placed or connected Brad Hoylman is, or his well placed political connections such as yourself, I think it is a sad state of affairs that a person connected with big real estate interests will be the one to replace Duane. Most of us here in Manhattan, most likely will come as a surprise to you and your high living associates, struggle to hold on to a place to live (whether we're straight or gay) - people attending to the real estate interests of New York University will not be representing me in Albany. Just look at the pile of money this guy has in his pot compared to the other two candidates. With this election, looks like the moral base that Duane represented will be lowered. Sad, but definitely fits 2012 American politics.
Aug. 29, 2012, 1:54 am

Comments closed.

Classifieds

Schneps Community News Group

Don’t miss out!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: