New York Introduces Bill Curbing Orientation Conversion Targeting Youth

Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Legislation introduced in Albany on April 26 to ban licensed therapists from engaging in practices aimed at altering the sexual orientation of minors would, if enacted, follow on a California law passed last year but currently on hold because of court challenges.

When Gay City News last reported on this issue, gay therapists here in New York were divided on the advisability of such a bill and there was no yet any legislative momentum for one. The new measure is sponsored by two Democrats –– State Senator Michael Gianaris of Queens and Assemblywoman Deborah Glick, an out lesbian from the West Village.

The Huffington Post reported that “Glick's interest in the ban grew out of her work with lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender youth.”

She cited the damage done to minors and others from such conversion therapy practices, compounding as they do the difficulties of being an LGBT youth in American society.

“The rate of suicide, the level of depression, the kind of bullying in school that is focused on homophobic epithets, even when students clearly are not gay… there's clearly an issue about being more supportive toward gay youth,” Glick told the website.

She and Gianaris argue that these therapeutic practices ––already opposed by the American Psychiatric Association along with other mental health professional groups –– run counter to that goal.

In summarizing the lawsuits that have stymied the California law, the Huffington Post wrote that opponents charge that it “attacks free speech, unconstitutionally regulates what therapists and patients can say to each other, and infringes on parents' authority to seek whatever type of professional help they choose for their children.”

Neither the California law nor the New York bill modeled after it, place any restrictions on therapists offering conversion therapy to adults or on parents taking their children to unlicensed counselors.

Gianaris sees his bill as important in the overall debate about the validity and dangers of efforts to steer people away from a same-sex orientation.

"It’s symbolic of the overall debate, and what underlies the belief of those who support this kind of therapy is that there is something wrong with being gay or lesbian.”

Updated 5:17 pm, July 20, 2018
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Reader feedback

Robben Wainer says:
I could have easily been treated for being in the closet and personally homophobic since I was sixteen. My therapist presented the opposite sex in a way to me that was more attractive and more fulfilling. I have since had to reconcile with having a very slow sexual orientation as a homosexual. I feel that the bill to ban sexual reorientation is anti- discriminatory. I don't feel therapists should shut the doors on the closet so easily, especially when they grow to understand the incentives that gay men practice. This hasy lead to a time, as is has for me, that is very confusing and leads to doubt, which in my case happened as a result of my therapist claiming he was gay, but I am not. I feel there should have been more channels open to my coming out, and that to re direct my preferences was a challenge that had to do with a false sense of safety, and misinterpreting masculine, and feminine gender roles. When we perceive it is time to come out the most positive step would be to reinforce this disposition.
June 10, 2013, 6:50 pm

Comments closed.


Schneps Community News Group

Don’t miss out!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: