Can Reclaim Pride Take Yes for an Answer?

Community News Group
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

The attitudes and actions of an institution that Reclaim Pride was taking to task “appear to be rooted in transphobic, racist, and classist attitudes,” the group wrote in an open letter circulated last week.

Was this a blast at the Trump administration?

Nope. The target, instead, was New York’s LGBT Community Center.

The hyperbolic missive from the group — whose primary objective is producing a Queer Liberation March on June 30 as an alternative to what it views as an over-corporatized LGBTQ Pride March — was, sadly, no model of either well-reasoned argumentation or substantiated claims, but let’s try to follow its logic anyway.

Reclaim members and others were upset that the Center had greenlighted a room reservation for the #WalkAway movement, a push launched last year by gay conservative Brandon Straka, who supports Donald Trump and hopes to lure unhappy Democrats away from their party. #WalkAway critics, in a March 22 open letter, said the group should find no welcome at the Center and demanded that the 13th Street institution be more transparent about its room rental policies.

The Center canceled the #WalkAway event the same day that first letter appeared.

Not content with that victory, the Center’s critics, in the Reclaim Pride letter that followed, faulted it for hypocritically claiming its goal was to maintain itself as a space for all voices in the community — despite the fact that between 2011 and 2013 the Center banned all meetings focused on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict in order to deny space to Queers Against Israeli Apartheid.

The Center, in fact, came under justifiable fire for that two-year moratorium, which it finally abandoned. While Reclaim Pride is correct that the Center never really acknowledged its errors in that unfortunate episode, it’s also true that this is now six-year-old history. And, many of the activists currently aligned with Reclaim Pride were among the most vociferous in their denunciations of the Center eight years ago for picking and choosing which points of view deserve to be aired in its space.

So which is it? Was the Center wrong to try to stifle queer Palestinian and allied voices or was it wrong to open its space up to queer conservatives? I readily acknowledge that my college career long predated the current campus culture that places a high premium on creating “safe spaces.” I am more of a traditional free speech advocate. You either believe the Center should be a space where a full range of opinions can be aired or you don’t.

And, for God’s sake, when the Center ends up caving to your demands to shut down #WalkAway, why not take your victory rather than cranking back up your ire three or four weeks later?

As for the rest of the Reclaim letter, the less said the better. How are we, in 2019, possibly to litigate the question of the late Sylvia Rivera being banned from the Center in the mid-1990s? Following that reference came an almost impossible to decipher claim about a support group for transgender women that involved “mandatory” drug testing and psychological evaluations. When Gay City News tracked down the source of this charge, we learned that the Reclaim Pride member voicing the complaint had only second-hand knowledge of a group she never attended and might well have been a substance abuse remediation program.

I could chalk this whole unfortunate letter up to a misfire by a well-meaning group of activists. But the larger concern it raises in my mind has to do with the kind of community that the June 30 Queer Liberation March aims to inspire. Let’s hope it’s not one marked by the sort of endless score-settling — even in the wake of progress, even victories — and baseless accusations suggested by last week’s open letter. None of that is going to be helpful in November 2020.

Updated 1:12 pm, April 25, 2019
Today’s news:
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Facebook

Don’t miss our updates:

Reader feedback

Marc Schnapp from San Diego says:
Although I've not been shy about my support for the more socially conscious commemoration of Stonewall that Reclaim Pride is aiming for, they seem eager at times to stake out positions without much reflection. I can't possibly agree with some of the silly stuff they've decided to release to the (blithely unaware) public. I agree with the underlying point of this opinion piece. As a veteran of the 1970 March, I can look back into 1969-1970. I can think of dogmatic positions that, on reflection, now seem ill-conceived. I hope Reclaim Pride will focus on the logistics for their ambitious task of commemorating both Stonewall and Christopher Street Liberation Day and make it an event we will look back on fondly.
April 25, 4:18 pm
Perry Brass from Riverdale, Bronx says:
I am neither a free speech libertarian nor as voraciously p.c. as a lot of people would like me to be, but for Reclaim Pride to skewer the Center like it did was ridiculous. I am very aware of the Walk Away Movement—there is some ground to believe that it might even be a Russian Trojan horse to show how the Democrats had "betrayed" good people and their conscientious decision to vote their Christian values—and side with the Evangelicals—rather than their ethnic or sexual-orientation loyalties. (Yes, look at the series of Walk Away videos and you'll see that theme repeated.) The Center basically tried to do the right thing—be an open space for a forum. Instead, some people want to fire bomb it. This goes back to the New Left approach from the old days that I used to characterize as: "Screw your friends and your enemies will take care of themselves." in other words, we need to start seeing who our real friends are, and the Center, despite its faults, and it does have them, is stiil among them.
April 25, 5:39 pm
Raymond Saint-Pierre from Plattsburgh, NY says:
Having been a volunteer, member, or associated with The Neutral Zone, GVYC,HMI,YES,LGTA,SAGE,and the Center from the 80s-00s. I remember the Center as a ramshackle former NYC school building with many dedicated activists. Its transformation into an urban, professional, bureaucratic community services center took decades. I knew Sylvia as well and there were many other times and places where her presence was banned due to both physical and mental concerns for her and others. Just as with certain other groups and persons over it's history. But being a large non-profit community organization dependent largely upon government and corporate funding like others it is at times tone deaf. But the same First Amendment rights that have been a part of Reclaim Pride 50 ( which as an #ACCIDENTALSTONEWALLER & @JURASSICQUEER, I support) apply to #WALKAWAY at present though I have many more concerns about its validity. I stopped attending the commercial Pride carnival of HOP decades ago as it transformed into its current state. But I hope just as there were those who marched and then 'fested' in the West Village or danced on the original piers and spaces, I hope there's room for both and more. And perhaps a bit more thought into rewriting history from the present and outside perspective without the actual experience?
April 25, 10:55 pm

Comments closed.


Schneps Community News Group

Don’t miss out!

Stay in touch with your community. Subscribe to our free newsletter: